Prototype Context for Evaluation

Target Audience Persona

Name: Sarah Johnson
Age: 34
Occupation: Part-time Retail Worker
Location: Orlando, Florida

Sarah is a single parent who struggles to afford basic necessities such as food, housing, healthcare, and education for her family. She wants a simple, reliable way to find community resources without spending hours searching multiple websites or making numerous phone calls.


Problem Statement

Low-income individuals and families need an easier way to find reliable community resources because current information is often scattered across multiple websites, making it difficult and time-consuming to access food, housing, healthcare, education, and employment assistance.


Value Proposition Statement

The Community Resource Hub provides one easy-to-use platform where users can quickly search for trusted community resources. By organizing food, housing, healthcare, education, and job assistance into one location, the website saves time, reduces frustration, and helps users connect with the services they need.


Prototype Features, Screens, and Functions


Core Functions

Persona 1

User A Persona

Name

Maria Lopez

Age

22 years old

Occupation

Single Parent and Part-Time Cashier

Location

Orlando, Florida

Goals & Motivations

Frustrations & Pain Points

Quote

"I don't have time to search ten different websites just to find help for my family."

Persona 2

User B Persona

Name

James Carter

Age

35 years old

Occupation

Part-Time Warehouse Worker

Location

Melbourne, Florida

Goals & Motivations

Frustrations & Pain Points

Quote

"I need one place that clearly tells me where I can get help."

Persona 3

User C Persona

Name

Aaliyah Brown

Age

19 years old

Occupation

College Student

Location

Tampa, Florida

Goals & Motivations

Frustrations & Pain Points

Quote

AI Focus Group Evaluation

Problem Statement Execution

User A – Maria Lopez (Single Parent)

Evaluation:

The prototype partially addresses my problem by placing food, housing, healthcare, education, and job resources in one website instead of requiring me to search multiple sources. However, I still don't know whether I qualify for each program or which resource I should use first.

Identified Issues:

Suggested Improvements:


User B – James Carter (Part-Time Worker)

Evaluation:

The website reduces the amount of searching I need to do, but I still need to compare several resources myself. The prototype organizes information well, but it doesn't save me enough time because I must read every listing.

Identified Issues:

Suggested Improvements:


User C – Aaliyah Brown (College Student)

Evaluation:

The prototype gives me a better starting point than searching online, but I'm still unsure which programs apply to someone in my situation. The AI Assistant is helpful, but I would still need guidance during the application process.

Identified Issues:

Suggested Improvements:


Persona Impact

User A

The search feature and organized categories reduce the time spent looking for help, but more personalized recommendations are needed.

User B

The navigation is straightforward, but the website would be more useful if search results could be filtered and sorted based on personal needs.

User C

The AI Assistant improves confidence by answering questions, but additional guidance throughout the application process would make the prototype more valuable.

Do the Users Disagree?


Value Proposition Alignment

Value Proposition: The Community Resource Hub provides one easy-to-use platform where users can quickly search for trusted community resources, reducing the time and frustration involved in finding assistance.

User A

The prototype supports the value proposition because it organizes resources in one place. However, it does not fully reduce frustration until users know which programs they qualify for.

User B

The website fulfills its promise of centralizing information, but the lack of advanced filtering limits its efficiency for busy users.

User C

The prototype aligns with the value proposition by making resources easier to discover, but it does not yet provide enough support after users find a resource.

Panel Discussion

User A: "The biggest barrier is uncertainty. If I don't know whether I qualify for a program, I'll still spend time researching elsewhere."

User B: "The biggest barrier is efficiency. Without filters and personalized search results, I'll still have to compare multiple resources."

User C: "The hardest part isn't finding resources—it's understanding what to do next. The website should guide users through the application process."

Common Conclusion: The panel agrees that the prototype brings resources together in one location, but it needs more personalization and guidance to fully deliver on its value proposition.


Constructive Suggestions

User A

User B

User C


Overall Recommendations

  1. Add personalized recommendations with an eligibility questionnaire and AI-powered resource matching.
  2. Improve the search feature with filters, sorting options, and an interactive map.
  3. Provide application guidance through step-by-step instructions, eligibility information, and progress tracking.

Supporting Evidence

These recommendations are based on established usability and accessibility principles as well as the perspectives of the three simulated users.